Overall positive feedback and requested checks are being followed-up
The team is now targeting to have the closure of the analysis on Dec 8th at the Top plenary. This will allow to start the paper circulation before the winter break (LHC H/TopWG meeting target was missed). Results/checks are being finalized to be added to the INT note and paper draft, in order to bring a complete analysis to the closure as requested by the conveners.
ttHML analysis status:
Most of the efforts focussed on defining MVA discriminants to be used in the SRs
Working with Jialin to come up with a good discriminant using DNN. Multiple configurations tested so far. Main bottleneck is the ttW CR and ttH SR definitions. Large anti-correlation (70%) observed between NF(ttH) and NF(ttW) which is not desirable. We are most likely going to drop the 4D DNN option in favour of the 3D DNN setup from Chen. We can alternatively check the 4D setup where the nodes are ttH, ttW, ttZ and ttbar+other instead of ttH, ttW, ttZ and ttbar (benefit from the reweighting studies performed so far).
First dedicated (mini/skimmed) ttHML ntuples production now mostly ready (few jobs to be retried). Main bottleneck for starting to check the samples is the limited eos space (HSG8 eos full). We are currently implementing a solution where the samples are saved on the Grid.
photon ID efficiency measurement & Zgamma analysis15m
Speaker:
Kang Liu
I have run though the example_zmass.py of R22 TnP and add the shower shape variables in it. But like the results of example.py, the vector also have more than 14 element. I am still checking.